Hardy Index Quantum readiness benchmark
Updated 2 October 2026
Chains rated 31
3 Native
5 Shipping
9 Committed
4 Debating
10 Exposed
Methodology v1.4

Benchmark

How ready is your blockchain for quantum computing?

An independent benchmark of 31 major chains, scored from 0 to 100 against a published rubric. Every figure carries a primary source.

Maintained editorially. Scores measure quantum readiness only and are not an assessment of an asset. The full rubric, including what it deliberately does not measure, is on the methodology page. If you want the threat explained in plain language first, start with the guides.

The index

Live monitor Checked daily. Last check : 30 of 31 profiles re-verified, 78 of 79 sources resolving. Ratings last changed . Run history

Filter by tier
31 chains, ranked by Hardy Score, as of 2 October 2026. Select a column heading to sort.
Rank Signature scheme on mainnet
1 Quantum Resistant Ledger QRL Native
92.0
XMSS (stateful hash-based), mandatory for all accounts
2 Mochimo MCM Native
90.0
WOTS+ (Winternitz one-time signature), hash-based, with PARAMSN 32 and WOTSW 16 per RFC 8391
3 Abelian ABEL Native
84.5
Lattice-based post-quantum signatures, mandatory for all transactions
4 NEAR Protocol NEAR Shipping
81.5
Ed25519 and secp256k1, with ML-DSA-65 available as a third first-class access-key scheme
5 Algorand ALGO Shipping
77.5
Ed25519 for standard accounts; Falcon for State Proofs and post-quantum transactions
6 Nervos CKB CKB Shipping
75.5
secp256k1 by default; SPHINCS+ available via an on-chain lock script
7 Bitcoin Cash BCH Shipping
66.0
ECDSA and Schnorr on secp256k1
8 Solana SOL Shipping
54.5
Ed25519 for all standard accounts
9 XRP Ledger XRP Committed
46.5
secp256k1 or Ed25519, selectable per account
10 Sui SUI Committed
45.5
Ed25519 for accounts, with multi-scheme support
11 Hedera HBAR Committed
42.0
Ed25519 or ECDSA on secp256k1, selectable per account
12 Stellar XLM Committed
41.0
Ed25519 for all classic accounts
13 Zcash ZEC Committed
41.0
RedDSA and RedPallas elliptic-curve signatures, with Halo 2 proofs
14 Aptos APT Committed
40.5
Ed25519 for account authentication
15 Polkadot DOT Committed
40.5
sr25519 (Schnorr over Ristretto-compressed Curve25519), with Ed25519 in some roles
16 Ethereum ETH Committed
40.0
ECDSA on secp256k1 for accounts; BLS for validator signatures
17 Cardano ADA Committed
37.5
Ed25519 for transaction signing; elliptic-curve VRF for slot-leader election
18 Tron TRX Debating
34.5
ECDSA on secp256k1
19 BNB Chain BNB Debating
22.5
ECDSA on secp256k1, for EVM compatibility
20 Monero XMR Debating
21.0
Ed25519 for signing; CLSAG linkable ring signatures, stealth addresses and Bulletproofs, all over the same curve
21 IOTA IOTA Exposed
18.5
Ed25519 (EdDSA over Curve25519 with SHA-512) for layer-1 transactions
22 Bitcoin BTC Debating
17.0
ECDSA and Schnorr on secp256k1
23 Internet Computer ICP Exposed
14.5
BLS for consensus, certification and randomness; threshold ECDSA over secp256k1 and threshold Schnorr over bip340secp256k1 and ed25519 for chain-key signatures; Ed25519 or ECDSA for user identities
24 TON TON Exposed
13.0
Ed25519, verified inside wallet smart contracts
25 Litecoin LTC Exposed
12.5
ECDSA on secp256k1, inherited from Bitcoin
26 Bittensor TAO Exposed
11.0
sr25519 (Schnorr over Curve25519) for coldkeys and hotkeys, the Substrate default
27 Dogecoin DOGE Exposed
11.0
ECDSA on secp256k1, inherited from Bitcoin
28 Avalanche AVAX Exposed
10.5
ECDSA on secp256k1 across the C-Chain, X-Chain and P-Chain
29 Cronos CRO Exposed
8.5
ECDSA on secp256k1 for EVM accounts, Cosmos SDK secp256k1 for native accounts, Ed25519 for validator consensus identities
30 MemeCore M Exposed
8.5
ECDSA on secp256k1, inherited from Ethereum Virtual Machine compatibility
31 Hyperliquid HYPE Exposed
7.0
ECDSA on secp256k1, via EIP-712 typed-data signing

Tier and score are separate axes. The tier records how far a chain has moved along the readiness spine. The score weighs six dimensions, some of which reward a sound algorithm choice or a low-exposure address model independently of deployment. Read them together.

This is a security-readiness assessment, not investment advice.